For small and mid-size companies running on AWS with no one whose job is the cloud bill. If waste is sitting in your accounts, this audit finds it, prices it, and tells you what to do first.
Book a 20-minute fit callMost small and mid-size companies on AWS do not have a cost problem because someone made a bad decision. They have one because cost questions fall between engineering and finance, and no named person is responsible for the bill. The symptoms are usually these four:
One named engagement, a fixed fee, a fixed timeline, and a written result you can act on with your own team or with any engineer you choose.
$2,500 to $5,000 fixed fee, set by account complexity, agreed before work starts. Two weeks, start to finish.
A senior architect reviews your AWS accounts the way an owner would want them reviewed: where the money goes, what can be cut, and what needs attention before it becomes expensive. You receive four things, in writing:
The report is yours to keep, whoever implements the findings.
If the audit finds little Then the report says so, plainly, and you still receive the full findings and the 90-day plan. Two protections come first: the fit call screens out accounts where meaningful savings are unlikely, and every estimate is counted conservatively, at the lower bound, recurring savings only.
This is the format every finding in the report follows: the evidence, the math, the assumptions, and what it would take to act on it.
Two RDS database instances show zero connections across 30 days of CloudWatch metrics. Fourteen EBS volumes, 1,400 GB in total, are attached to nothing and show no read or write activity in the same period. All of them carry tags from a staging environment the team believes was shut down last year.
On-demand pricing in a US region, instances running around the clock, storage priced at the standard general-purpose SSD rate. Your report prices your findings at your actual rates and usage; the figures here are illustrative.
High. Thirty days of zero connections and zero storage activity is strong evidence, and the tagging points to a retired environment.
About two hours of engineering time: take final snapshots, stop the instances, and confirm with the team before anything is deleted.
Low. The one real risk is that a quiet instance is a seasonal or failover resource. The safeguard: snapshot everything, stop rather than delete, and hold for 14 days. If anything is missed, the instances restart in minutes. After deletion, snapshots are kept for 90 days, so the data can still be restored.
Snapshot, stop, hold 14 days, then terminate the instances and delete the volumes. Expected result at the assumed rates: $623 per month back.
No client numbers are used on this page. The tables below are simple arithmetic at the stated assumptions, so you can judge the engagement against your own bill.
| Your monthly AWS spend | Savings at 10% | Annual savings | Audit fee | Payback period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 per month | $500 per month | $6,000 | $2,500 | 5 months |
| $10,000 per month | $1,000 per month | $12,000 | $2,500 | 2.5 months |
| $25,000 per month | $2,500 per month | $30,000 | $5,000 | 2 months |
| $50,000 per month | $5,000 per month | $60,000 | $5,000 | 1 month |
| Your monthly AWS spend | Savings at 5% | Annual savings | Audit fee | Payback period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 per month | $250 per month | $3,000 | $2,500 | 10 months |
| $10,000 per month | $500 per month | $6,000 | $2,500 | 5 months |
| $25,000 per month | $1,250 per month | $15,000 | $5,000 | 4 months |
| $50,000 per month | $2,500 per month | $30,000 | $5,000 | 2 months |
Assumptions, stated plainly: the tables show savings at 5 percent and at 10 percent of your monthly spend. The 5 percent table is the conservative case, and the 10 percent table is the higher scenario. The identified savings are then implemented. The fee shown is the fixed fee for accounts of that complexity. Payback period is the fee divided by the monthly savings.
If the audit does not identify recurring annual savings of at least three times its fee, the fee is refunded. Identified savings are priced at your actual rates, lower bound, as described in the FAQ.
The whole engagement runs in two weeks and asks very little of your team.
Your time commitment: about 2 hours in total. The fit call, a short access setup, and the walkthrough call. Everything else happens on our side.
The audit needs to see your accounts, not touch them. Access is a read-only IAM role that you create, with the exact policy shared with you before anything is granted.
Nothing changes in production during an audit. The work is analysis only. When the report is delivered, you delete the role and access ends; we confirm the end of access in writing. An NDA is available on request, before any access is granted. Billing exports and working notes are deleted 30 days after delivery.
Dr. Primus Vekuh founded Primus Cloud Solutions and does the work on every engagement personally. When you book the audit, he is the person who reviews your accounts, writes your report and sits on your walkthrough call. There are no account managers and no junior staff, and nothing is handed off.
His background is senior cloud architecture work, including senior cloud architect roles at global consulting firms, across migration, DevOps, security and AI workloads. He holds a PhD in Information Technology from the University of the Cumberlands (2024), and his doctoral research studied exactly the companies this practice serves: how small and mid-size companies adopt cloud computing, and what that adoption does to their costs, their users and their performance.
Three findings from that research shape how this practice works. First, the decision turns on trust, not technology: companies adopted cloud when they trusted the people and the process behind it, not because a feature list won. Second, preparation predicted performance: the companies that prepared before adopting got the gains, and the ones that bought first and prepared later did not. Third, the software was the easy part: the hard parts were the decisions around it, who owns the system, what it costs month to month, and how people work differently once it is in place.
The dissertation is published and public: Analyzing the Impact of Cloud Computing in SMEs: A Study of Adoption, User Experience, and Performance in Cameroon. You can read it in full at the link in the research section below.
An audit answers the question once. Most growing companies then need someone senior who keeps owning the answers. The fractional engagement is the audit's continuation: a set block of senior architect time each month, with one named owner for your cloud decisions.
What the principal owns for you:
Engagement terms: a set monthly block of senior time, scoped on the fit call. Exit on 30 days written notice, at any time. Pricing is set on the fit call, based on the block of time your accounts actually need.
Book a 20-minute fit callOne honest page on fit saves wasted calls on both sides. If your company is in the first column, the fit call is worth your 20 minutes.
Practices built for $20,000+ a month accounts will turn a $5,000 to $15,000 account away. This audit is priced for yours.
The doctoral research behind this practice studied how small and mid-size companies actually adopt cloud computing. Three of its findings come up in almost every engagement.
Prefer it on one page? Download the three findings as a one-page brief (PDF).
The adoption decision turned on trust in the provider and the process, not on feature lists. Companies moved when they believed the people guiding them.
What it means for your audit: you see the exact access policy, the counting method and every finding in writing, so the work never has to be taken on trust.
Companies that prepared before adopting, skills, process and expectations, saw the performance gains. Companies that bought first and prepared later mostly did not.
What it means for your audit: the 90-day action plan sequences each change so your team is ready for it before it lands.
The tools installed quickly. The disappointments came from decisions nobody had made explicit: who owns the system, what it costs every month, and who answers when it surprises you.
What it means for your audit: every finding names an owner and a decision, not just a setting to change.
The questions owners and CTOs ask on the fit call, answered the same way here.
A read-only IAM role in your AWS accounts, created by you, using the exact policy we send you before anything is granted. It can see billing data, resource configuration and usage metrics. It cannot change, stop, delete or buy anything. The audit does not need, and does not ask for, your application data or your customer data. When the report is delivered, you delete the role and access ends.
No. The audit is analysis only. Nothing is changed, stopped, resized or purchased in your accounts at any point. If you later choose implementation help, each change is agreed with you before it is made, one at a time.
Each finding is priced from your actual usage and your current rates, against your most recent full billing month. Where a finding could be worth a range, the report uses the lower bound. Only recurring savings are counted in a finding's headline figure; one-time cleanups are listed separately. Every estimate states its assumptions next to the number, so your own engineers can check the math.
The audit is guaranteed: if it does not identify recurring annual savings of at least three times its fee, the fee is refunded. Then the report says so, plainly, and you still receive the full findings and the 90-day plan. Two things protect you before it comes to that. The first is the fit call: if your spend and setup make meaningful savings unlikely, you will be told not to book the audit. The second is how the estimates are built: conservative assumptions, lower bounds, recurring savings only, so the report never needs optimistic numbers to look worthwhile.
Dr. Primus Vekuh, personally, from the fit call to the walkthrough. There are no account managers, no junior staff and no hand-offs. If a question needs an answer, the person who reviewed your accounts is the person who answers it.
That is your choice, and nothing follows automatically. You can implement the findings with your own team, since the report is yours to keep. You can engage implementation help for specific findings. Or you can move to the fractional architect engagement, where the findings become a standing backlog reviewed every month. You can start with the audit alone and decide afterwards, with the report in hand.
Tell us what you are trying to fix or build. Your monthly AWS spend range helps us judge fit before the call, and if the audit is not likely to pay for itself, you will be told on the call. Replies come within two business days.